|
Message
From: jfilling at gmail.com<jfilling@g...>
Date: Tue May 17 00:07:11 CEST 2005
Subject: [usb] USB list dead?
I discovered this issue during testing a while back. The
USBF_RX_ACK_TO_VAL_FS and USBF_TX_DATA_TO_VAL_FS values in the USB 2.0
function core are too small. Once I increased these timeouts, the core
started responding in a more reasonable fashion.
----- Original Message -----
From: Igor Mohor<igor.mohor@g...>
To:
Date: Mon Dec 20 18:43:12 CET 2004
Subject: [usb] USB list dead?
> Hi, everybody.
>
> I sent a question some time ago to this list (see below). Now I'm
> resending it and wondering if this list is dead or people just too
> busy to answer.
> If this doesn't work, I'll send another letter in a "Hello,
> I'm a
> student, send results" fasion.
> Regards,
> Igor
> From: Igor Mohor<igor.mohor@g...>
> Date: Wed Dec 1 14:18:48 CET 2004
> Subject: [usb] timeout values
>
>
>
> Hi.
> Are values used for "RX timeout" OK? The Opencores USB
> core uses 400
> ns for HS and and 622 ns for FS. I believe the value should be 816
> bit
> times for
> HS (1.7 us) and 16-18 bit times for FS (1.33 us - 1.5 us).
> Am I wrong or right?
> Best regards,
> Igor
>
>
|
 |
Browse
