LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Advertise
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  • Job Opportunity
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Usb > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: "Luis J. Perez" <luis.perez@d...>
    Date: Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:24:53 +0100
    Subject: Re: [usFrom owner-usb@o... Mon Feb 25 13:10:23 2002
    Top

    Rudolf Usselmann wrote:
    > 
    > On Sunday 24 February 2002 10:51 pm, you wrote:
    > > Hello all,
    > >
    > > I intend to downgrade USB 2.0 core of OpenCores to USB 1.1
    > > which will operate at Low and Full Speed rates. The reason
    > > is to enrich cores' variety of OpenCores and to enable mass
    > > testing of USB core in OpenCores community.
    > >
    > > Before I do that, I would like to know about your opinion. The
    > > most important is from Mr. Rudolf Usselmann, the USB 2.0 core
    > > creator. Also I knew from the project list that there is a USB host
    > > controller project and according to USB archive, it is also a
    > > function controller, not a host controller (p.s: I don't contact
    > > its maintainer yet...). Thanks...
    > 
    > Two suggestions:
    > 
    > 1) There is no need to downgrade the core, as it will operate
    > in all three modes (low, full and high) just fine. I think it would
    > be a better idea to write a PHY that supports only low and full
    > speed modes instead. That way one could test the complete
    > solution at low and full speeds in an FPGA.
    > 
    > 2) For only low and full speed, it might desirable to create a
    > different host interface. instead of using shared SSRAM, FIFOs
    > might be a better solution for many applications. It would be
    > nice to be able to select between the SSRAM and FIFO
    > interface.
    > 
    > As to the "USB Host controller" project, it's bogus. It's a function
    > project as well, and the authors seem to have misunderstood
    > several important issues from the USB specification ... I have
    > emailed the authors but never got a reply, I have also asked
    > Damjan to remove the project, but that has not happened yet ...
    > 
    > Cheers,
    > rudi
    > 
    > > Best regard,
    > >
    > >
    > > RE Tambunan
    > 
    
    
    I did a quick design for the first solution proposed by Rudi (a PHY that
    supports low-full speed) . That was 2 or 3 months ago, and no longer
    working on it. I'm not very proud of it, and I feel it could be better.
    If you are really interested, please contact me...
    
    
    ========================================================
    Luis Jose Perez Lafuente      	luis.perez@d...
    Design Engineer
    Digital Design Department
    
    Design of Systems on Silicon  	http://www.ds2.es
    Av. Charles Robert Darwin, 2  	Phone.  +34-96-136 60 04
    Parc Tecnologic	              	                Ext. 152
    46980 Paterna (VALENCIA)      	FAX     +34-96-136 62 50
    SPAIN
    ========================================================
    
    
    

    ReferenceAuthor
    [usb] downgrade to USB1.1 low speedRE Tambunan
    Re: [usb] downgrade to USB1.1 low speedRudolf Usselmann

    Follow upAuthor
    Re: [usb] downgrade to USB1.1 low speedRE Tambunan

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.