LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Advertise
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  • Job Opportunity
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Usb > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: "Peter Teng" <peter_teng@e...>
    Date: Tue, 9 Jan 2001 18:33:48 -0800
    Subject: RE: [usb] USB 2.0 core Spec. First Draft
    Top

    Rudolf,
    
    	The 192 bit time only applies the gap time exist on the USB 2.0 bus.
    Excluding the UTMI decoding time for previous transaction, up the UTMI
    preparation time for next transaction, you have only 14 clk time!
    
    If you don't see my response within 24 business hours to your email, please
    email me using pteng@m..., pteng@y... or peter_teng@e..., or
    please call me direct. Sorry in advance for the trouble that may caused you.
    
    best regards,
    "Peter" Chu Tin Teng
    Computing technology I/O Group
    NEC Electronics Inc.
    Physical address
    3301 Olcott St.,
    Santa Clara, CA 95054
    
    Mailing address
    Olcott Building
    2880 Scott Blvd., M/S: SC2302
    P.O. Box 58062
    Santa Clara, CA  95052-8062
    Tel: (408)9692766
    Fax: (408)9692435
    Email: peter_teng@e.../pteng@m...
    
    
    -----Original Message-----
    From: Rudolf Usselmann [mailto:rudi@a...]
    Sent: Tuesday, January 09, 2001 6:24 PM
    To: usb@o...; Peter Teng
    Cc: Damjan Lampret
    Subject: Re: [usb] USB 2.0 core Spec. First Draft
    
    
    
    Peter (and others !),
    
    I just looked through the USB spec for device latency.
    
    Am I correct that a High Speed function has at most 192 bit times to reply ?
    
    That would be about 400 nS ?!
    
    I guess my linked list idea will not work then ! I just did my latency
    calculations again, and they come to about 1392 nS worst case !
    
    Comments ?
    
    Thanks !
    rudi
    
    
    
    

    ReferenceAuthor
    Re: [usb] USB 2.0 core Spec. First DraftRudolf Usselmann

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.