|
Message
From: Rudolf Usselmann <rudi@a...>
Date: Thu, 04 Jan 2001 08:29:02 +0700
Subject: Re: [usb] USB Core and PHY
Mike,
the short answer is Yes !
If I use a off the shelf PHY it makes the design much easier, and I
can concentrate on the protocol engine. I've looked over the spec
and it doesn't look that complex.
I'm a 15 year veteran, and have designed protocol engines for ethernet,
cable modems and atm. I think USB will be trivial compared to the others !
Cheers !
rudi
on 1/4/01 0:26, Mike Kentley at mkentley@h... wrote:
> Rudy, my question to you is -- do you really want to do a USB 2.0 core
> first? What if you started with a 1.1 core, but partitioned the logic so
> that your SIE had the same pinout as the USB 2.0 UTMI? This would allow
> you to replace the serial logic with the real UTMI at a later date, then
> you could upgrade your 1.1 protocol engine to support the USB 2.0
> extensions. This gets you to silicon and a plugfest quickly, and gives a
> relatively easy migration path. While you are working on USB 2.0
> extensions, someone else can be working on software drivers etc. for the
> 1.1 core.
>
> I've been working with USB IP for the last 3 years. I've got stuck with
> small design teams on all my USB projects, and getting everything done
> with a small number of people has been a real bear. You have got an big
> task ahead of you, and I think you would have more fun if you made it as
> easy as possible for yourself.
>
>
> Let me know if I can help. Regards,
>
> Mike Kentley
>
>
>
|
 |
Browse
