|
Message
From: Miha Dolenc<mihad@o...>
Date: Wed Mar 30 09:56:42 CEST 2005
Subject: [pci] PCI Bus at 66 Mhz
Hi!I don't remember if I asked this before: Does PNR meet I/O timing constraints also? What clock do you use on the WISHBONE bus? PCI/WB clock ratio can be a problem in timing simulations, since flip-flops between clock domains can have setup/hold time violations. If possible, use same clock for WISHBONE and PCI. The other solution is to disable setup/hold checks on the synchronization flip-flops.
Best Regards, Miha Dolenc
----- Original Message ----- From: "Mihelogiannakis giorgos" <mihelog@c...> To: <pci@o...> Sent: Tuesday, March 29, 2005 7:05 PM Subject: [pci] PCI Bus at 66 Mhz
> Hello everyone, > Sorry to grab your attention for yet another time. The reason this > time is difficulties in making the PCI bus run at 66 Mhz. > According to the timing report while generating a post PNR simulation > model for the PCI bridge, the minimum clock for the PCI bus is 14.2 ns, > which means that 66 Mhz is possible. Therefore, i set the PCI66 constant > which changes a setting in the configuration space (to indicate that it's > capable of 66 Mhz) and makes the testbench produce a PCI llock with 15 ns > period. > Functional simulation works fine, and there is no difference in how the > bridge operates. However, post PNR simulation model is not so cooperative. > Although configuration space accesses have no problem (since they don't > use the PCI bus), when it comes to producing configuration space cycles on > the PCI bus, the PCI bus monitor sees that: > > *** monitor - PCI Real OE signals have X's {F, I, D_T_S, AD, CBE, PERR} > 'bxx0xx0 > > which -of course- is what one can see at the waveform. This happens when a > read is requested from address 000001e5 (CNF_DATA register if i am not > mistaken) which would produce a configuration read cycle on the PCI bus. > After that, everything seems damaged in a way, even outputs to the other > side of the bridge are in X state when they were supposed to be at 1. > Continuing with requests (othe requests) does not help. > Post-map simulation model has the same problem, while post-translate > doesn't. If you are using Xilinx ISE as i am, all project properties are > at their default values, while the board is xc2vp70 (family Virtex2P) , > speed grade -6 and device package ff1517. > > Thank you very much in advance for nay help you can provide, > George Michelogiannakis > _______________________________________________ > http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/pci
|
 |