|
Message
From: random_user@1...
Date: Sun, 28 Jul 2002 04:29:51 -0100
Subject: Re: [pci] about simulation
Thank you very much for your kind help!
But,taking the difference between P-T-P and sharded bus into
account, would you give me some advices about how to modify the
testbench to be used in a cardbus to wishbone bridge ?
Is the configuration cycle initiated by the host or one of the MASTER
card?
regards,
wangc
----- Original Message -----
From: "Miha Dolenc" <mihad@o... >
To: <pci@o... >
Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2002 09:20:02 +0200
Subject: Re: [pci] about simulation
>
>
> Point to Point means that every configuration cycle the device
> detects is
> meant for it, so it has to be accepted. Therefore I suppose, you do
> not need
> an IDSEL pin. You should hardwire IDSEL pin of your "CardBus"
> target to
> constant 1.
>
> Regards,
> Miha Dolenc
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: <random_user@1... >
> To: <pci@o... >
> Sent: Thursday, July 25, 2002 7:59 AM
> Subject: [pci] about simulation
>
>
> > Hi all,
> > I am now working at the testbench and I have met with
> some
> > problems.
> > 1.Why there are two pci_behaviorial_device modules in the
> > testbench? Isn't one enough?
> > 2.I am trying to modify the testbench to be used in a
> CardBus
> > project.But in the CardBus spec.there is no idsel pin,so when
> I use this
> > testbench,an error occured:more than one device drive devsel
> > simultaneously! When I read the CardBus spec.,I noticed that
> the
> > Cardbus is a point to point bus,while PCI is a shared bus.What
> on earth
> > does this mean and HOW would this influence the configuration
> access?
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > regards,
> > wangc
> >
> >
>
|
 |
Browse
