LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Sponsors
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Cores > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: Lauro, John<jlauro@u...>
    Date: Sat Oct 21 00:53:02 CEST 2006
    Subject: [oc] PCOACH
    Top
    Considering it's over 20 years old, I doubt there would be too many
    legal issues.

    That said, it is a relatively uninteresting cpu... For low end stuff,
    there is 6809, Z80 and other clones, and we also have plenty of 32 bit
    options for higher end stuff...

    A 386 based system would be more interesting, but given it's
    compatibility modes you would probably need to start with an 8088/8086
    anyways...




    -----Original Message-----
    From: cores-bounces@o... [mailto:cores-bounces@o...]
    On Behalf Of samiam@m...
    Sent: Friday, October 20, 2006 7:39 PM
    To: cores@o...
    Subject: [oc] PCOACH

    I'd like to float a discussion on a PCOACH.

    I think the original PC would be doable without much more work than we
    are expending to create some of the CPUs.

    Of course, its occurred to me that the reason there are not any of
    those
    certain types of CPUs here is because everyone believes a certain
    lawsuit
    happy company would go after anyone who even thought about it.

    I'd be willing to split the work on it.

    Scott
    _______________________________________________
    http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/cores

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.