LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Advertise
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  • Job Opportunity
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Cores > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: Rudolf Usselmann<rudi@a...>
    Date: Sun Mar 19 14:39:46 CET 2006
    Subject: Fwd: Fwd: Re: [oc] AC97 system integration
    Top
    On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 20:27 +0700, Rudolf Usselmann wrote:
    > On Sun, 2006-03-19 at 12:51 +0100, otto otto wrote:
    > > >
    > > >Arnim,
    > > >
    > > >why don't you publish your modifications that you previously
    > > >emailed me ? I think they might be helpful to others as well.
    > > >
    > > >Best Regards,
    > > >rudi
    > >
    > > Rudi,
    > >
    > > shouldn't it be your job to update your core on the OpenCores webserver, if
    > > Arnim found some bugs in it and informed you!?!??!
    >
    > Yes that would be my job if he indeed found bugs. But he did
    > not. My design works just fine the way it is (according with
    > the provided spec).


    Let me correct myself here.

    First of all writing FREE IP Cores is NOT my job. Secondly,
    since most people only complain and are never satisfied, I
    see no reason to contribute to OpenCores at all (or did you
    see anything from me in the last 2 years ?).

    For each "Thanks for the hard work" email I get, I get about
    100 complain emails like yours. So why should I participate
    here at all ?

    > He made some modification that go beyond the original design
    > goals.
    >
    > > Out of my experience I assume that you won't do it. :-(
    >
    > What experience is that ?
    >
    > > I know that all your USB cores on OpenCores are buggy and that you don't
    > > update them ... probably because you earn more money with the working
    > > versions you offer at www.asics.ws ...
    >
    > Actually the USB 1.1 Device and PHY are working just fine. There
    > are several success stories about them. The USB 2.0 Device IP got
    > never finished, because when I was developing the free version
    > nobody wanted to help with verification.
    >
    > > That's not really in the sens of OpenCores ...
    >
    > Instead of complaining why don't you go and write a few free IP
    > cores yourself.
    >
    > > Best Regards,
    > >
    > > damc
    >
    > rudi


    I presume this is my last posting here, since I will now
    un-subscribe from this list. Good luck to all the contributors ...


    rudi
    =============================================================
    Rudolf Usselmann, ASICS World Services, http://www.asics.ws
    Your Partner for IP Cores, Design, Verification and Synthesis
    ****** Certified USB 2.0 HS OTG and HS Device IP Cores ******

    ReferenceAuthor
    Fwd: Fwd: Re: [oc] AC97 system integrationRudolf Usselmann

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.