OPENCORES.ORG

Sorry, for the late reply. I've just returned from a holiday. I forgot, is

I hope you had some nice holidays!
I removed the PAGENUM constant completely with the last checkin.
I hope that's ok.

I now think about removing also the PAGEDEPTH constant from the package 
and providing it as a generic instead. This would give some more
flexibility because it can then be set differently if multiple instances
are used within the same design. If we add 256 as a default value to this
generic then we have more flexibility and the design is kept compatible.

How do you think about it?

Michael

On Fri, Oct 28, 2005 at 12:31:43AM +0200, rpaley_yid@y... wrote:
> Sorry, for the late reply. I've just returned from a holiday. I forgot, is 
> PAGENUM used in any of the architectures? Especially the linked list one..
> 
> r
> 
> ----- Original Message ----- 
> From: Michael Geng<vhdl@M...> 
> To: 
> Date: Tue Oct 18 19:24:01 CEST 2005 
> Subject: [oc] single_port: remove PAGENUM constant 
> 
> > Hi Robert, 
> > 
> > since the single_port model uses unconstrained vectors for the data 
> > and address buses the PAGENUM 
> > constant is no longer required. I would like to remove it from 
> > single_port_pkg completely and 
> > replace it in single_port.vhd in the following way: 
> > < TYPE mem_typ IS ARRAY ( 0 TO PAGENUM*PAGEDEPTH-1 ) OF 
> > BIT_VECTOR(d'RANGE); 
> > > TYPE mem_typ IS ARRAY ( 0 TO 2**a'length-1 ) OF 
> > BIT_VECTOR(d'RANGE); 
> > Is that ok with you? 
> > Michael 
> > 
> > 
> _______________________________________________
> http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/cores