|
Message
From: Michael Geng<vhdl@M...>
Date: Wed Oct 12 21:59:46 CEST 2005
Subject: [oc] Extensions to single_port asynchronous memory model
Hi Robert, Damjan, Matjaz,I could successfully add the announced changes. I also added the suggested opencores header and a copy of the LGPL license.
Thank you all for your help! Michael
On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 11:19:26PM +0200, rpaley_yid@y... wrote: > Michael, > > Please add a GPL copywrite statement in each file and reference the > GPL. Also, to avoid problems with links going away, please add a copy of > the GPL to this project. The location is.... > > http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.txt to the project. > > regards, > r > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: Michael Geng<vhdl@M...> > To: > Date: Tue Oct 11 22:09:32 CEST 2005 > Subject: [oc] Extensions to single_port asynchronous memory model > > > On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 09:18:43PM +0200, Damjan Lampret wrote: > > Robert, > > my username at opencores.org is mgeng. > > Regards, > > Michael > > > You need to be added by the relevant project's maintaner. Only > > project > > > maintainers can add new maintainers to their project. This can > > be done by > > > going to Admin link - you have to be logged in with your > > username and > > > password to see Admin. > > > > > > regards > > > Damjan > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Michael Geng" <vhdl at MichaelGeng.de> > > > To: "Discussion list about free open source IP > > cores" <cores at opencores.org> > > > Cc: "Robert Paley" <rpaley_yid at yahoo.com> > > > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:02 PM > > > Subject: Re: [oc] Extensions to single_port asynchronous > > memory model > > > > > > > > > >On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 08:24:07PM +0200, rpaley_yid at > > yahoo.com wrote: > > > >>I like your additions and have asked the site admin > > people to add you as > > > >>a maintainer. i'm pleased to know that by using the > > linked-list > > > >>architecture, you were able to cut memory usage by 4x. > > Did you notice > > > >>any change in simulation speed? > > > > > > > >Thank you for your confidence! I will check in the changes > > as soon as I > > > >have the appropriate > > > >rights. > > > > > > > >Before I used your linked list model the simulator > > required more memory > > > >than I have in my PC so > > > >that it started swapping. Because of this in my special > > case the > > > >simulation speed increased even > > > >with the linked list architecture as it doesn't swap any > > more. I haven't > > > >done any exact > > > >measurements neither on memory usage nor on speed, also > > the 4x increase is > > > >a very rough estimation. > > > >I'm just happy that I found a solution to simulate my > > whole system > > > >including external memory. > > > > > > > >There's an initial version checked in (1.1) and there's a > > branch > > > >(1.1.1.1). I can't see any > > > >differences. Are there any? What were the reasons for > > branching? > > > > > > > >I can't find any license statements with this core. I > > would like to see it > > > >under the GPL. How do > > > >you think about it? > > > > > > > >Michael > > > >_______________________________________________ > > > >http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/cores > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/cores
|
 |