|
Message
From: rpaley_yid at yahoo.com<rpaley_yid@y...>
Date: Tue Oct 11 23:19:26 CEST 2005
Subject: [oc] Extensions to single_port asynchronous memory model
Michael, Please add a GPL copywrite statement in each file and reference the GPL. Also, to avoid problems with links going away, please add a copy of the GPL to this project. The location is....
http://www.gnu.org/copyleft/gpl.txt to the project.
regards, r
----- Original Message ----- From: Michael Geng<vhdl@M...> To: Date: Tue Oct 11 22:09:32 CEST 2005 Subject: [oc] Extensions to single_port asynchronous memory model
> On Tue, Oct 11, 2005 at 09:18:43PM +0200, Damjan Lampret wrote: > Robert, > my username at opencores.org is mgeng. > Regards, > Michael > > You need to be added by the relevant project's maintaner. Only > project > > maintainers can add new maintainers to their project. This can > be done by > > going to Admin link - you have to be logged in with your > username and > > password to see Admin. > > > > regards > > Damjan > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Michael Geng" <vhdl at MichaelGeng.de> > > To: "Discussion list about free open source IP > cores" <cores at opencores.org> > > Cc: "Robert Paley" <rpaley_yid at yahoo.com> > > Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2005 9:02 PM > > Subject: Re: [oc] Extensions to single_port asynchronous > memory model > > > > > > >On Mon, Oct 10, 2005 at 08:24:07PM +0200, rpaley_yid at > yahoo.com wrote: > > >>I like your additions and have asked the site admin > people to add you as > > >>a maintainer. i'm pleased to know that by using the > linked-list > > >>architecture, you were able to cut memory usage by 4x. > Did you notice > > >>any change in simulation speed? > > > > > >Thank you for your confidence! I will check in the changes > as soon as I > > >have the appropriate > > >rights. > > > > > >Before I used your linked list model the simulator > required more memory > > >than I have in my PC so > > >that it started swapping. Because of this in my special > case the > > >simulation speed increased even > > >with the linked list architecture as it doesn't swap any > more. I haven't > > >done any exact > > >measurements neither on memory usage nor on speed, also > the 4x increase is > > >a very rough estimation. > > >I'm just happy that I found a solution to simulate my > whole system > > >including external memory. > > > > > >There's an initial version checked in (1.1) and there's a > branch > > >(1.1.1.1). I can't see any > > >differences. Are there any? What were the reasons for > branching? > > > > > >I can't find any license statements with this core. I > would like to see it > > >under the GPL. How do > > >you think about it? > > > > > >Michael > > >_______________________________________________ > > >http://www.opencores.org/mailman/listinfo/cores > > > > > >
|
 |