LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Sponsors
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Cores > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: John Sheahan <jrsheahan@o...>
    Date: 14 Jun 2003 10:50:22 +1000
    Subject: Re: [oc] The use of both edge of the clock.
    Top

    On Sat, 2003-06-14 at 01:46, nico@s... wrote:
    > At school, we learn that design must be full synchronous on one edge of
    > the clock to avoid any timing hasard.
    > 
    > But, i see very often some chip interface that sample or deliver the data
    > at the folling edge of the clock. Does this trick very usefull ? Does it
    > generate dozen of "false path" for synthetiser ?
    > 
    > What is the common rules and pitfall about using this ?
    > 
    this trick is (well, was)  very common in the datacomms world. 
    Sending data from one place to another on one edge - and sampling on 
    the other, can help a lot with setup and hold under the right 
    circumstances.
    
    (usually those where things are slow enough that clock and data are sent
     separately. Faster - embedded clock is the way to go)
    john
    
    
    
    
    

    ReferenceAuthor
    [oc] The use of both edge of the clock.Nico

     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.