LOGIN   :::   RECOVER PASS   :::   GET ACCOUNT    
Browse
  • Projects
  • Code (CVS)
  • Forums
  • News
  • Articles
  • Polls
  •  
    OpenCores
  • FAQ
  • CVS HowTo
  • Mission
  • Media
  • Tools
  • Sponsors
  • Mirrors
  • Logos
  • Contact us
  •  
    Tools
  • Search
      
  • Download Cores (CVSGet)
  •  
    More
  • Wishbone
  • Perlilog
  • EDA tools
  • OpenTech CD
  •  
    Navigation: All forums > Cores > Message List > Message Post

    Message

    Reply | Reply all
    Date Prev | Date Next | Thread Prev | Thread Next Date Index | Thread Index

    From: khchang@h...
    Date: Thu, 24 Apr 2003 06:31:44 -0100
    Subject: Re: [oc] UART16550 core
    Top

    
    
    ----- Original Message ----- 
    From: ddresdner@p...  
    To: carl@o... , cores@o...  
    Date: Mon, 30 Sep 2002 23:33:16 -0100 
    Subject: Re: [oc] UART16550 core 
    
    > 
    > 
    > Igor, 
    > 
    > I would very much like to get a copy of your VHDL version of the 
    > 16550 
    > Uart. We would like to use it in a project that we are working on. 
    > Would 
    > it be possible to get the source for that. I would appreciated it. 
    > 
    > Thank you, 
    > Danny Dresdner 
    > 
    > ddresdner@p...  
    > 
    > ----- Original Message ----- 
    > From: "Carl van Schaik" <carl@o... > 
    > To: <cores@o... > 
    > Date: Tue, 7 Aug 2001 08:04:19 +0200 
    > Subject: Re: [oc] UART16550 core 
    > 
    > > 
    > > 
    > > Hi Igor, 
    > > 
    > > > so if I understand correctly, there are two versions, one 
    > in 
    > > Verilog that 
    > > > was downloaded 
    > > > from the opencores and one in VHDL that you wrote 
    > (perhaps 
    > > opencores files 
    > > > translated to 
    > > > VHDL and than changed). 
    > > This is correct except that the Verilog was not simply 
    > converted to 
    > > VHDL. 
    > > I have written UART's before and used the Verilog code mainly 
    > as an 
    > > example 
    > > for my own code for the 16550. 
    > > 
    > > > I don't know which ones to take for testing. I'm a 
    > verilog 
    > > guy, not VHDL, 
    > > > although I would 
    > > > take the VHDL files if they contain less bugs than the 
    > ones in 
    > > verilog. 
    > > 
    > > Well, from what I saw, the Verilog version has a few bugs. The 
    > main 
    > > ones I 
    > > noticed are: 
    > > 
    > > FIFO - not cleared when data is popped out(empty). - Error 
    > bits 
    > > could remain 
    > > Break detection looked a bit weird (but I'm not a Verilog 
    > person) 
    > > Stop_bits signal in LCR(Line control register) is not used. 
    > > Only 16550 mode is supported, not 16540. 
    > > Break error is not passed through the FIFO! 
    > > Reciever will continue to recieve (0's) after a break is 
    > detected. 
    > > 
    > > > Can you tell me if I'm correct about the differences. 
    > > > 
    > > > In the meantime I'll start with the Verilog files. 
    > > > 
    > > > Regards, 
    > > > Igor 
    > > 
    > > regards 
    > > Carl 
    > > 
    > 
    
    
    
     
    Copyright (c) 1999 OPENCORES.ORG. All rights reserved.